Online Now 1951

The Bodda Getta

The place for Tiger fans to talk football, basketball and recruiting

On this Board 733
Record: 6992 (11/25/2012)

Online now 1728
Record: 9788 (12/4/2012)

Boards ▾

The Bodda Getta

The place for Tiger fans to talk football, basketball and recruiting

Dye Hard All Topic

The place for Tiger fans to talk about everything Auburn and not!

The Ticket Exchange

Buy and sell your Auburn Tiger tickets here.

Reply

Ohio State Claims 2013 National Title

  • This post is for members of AuburnUndercover only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    Rbl92

  • This post is for members of AuburnUndercover only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    ColaChiver

  • This post is for members of AuburnUndercover only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    LittleE4AU

  • ColaChiver said...

    Dawww someone got their feelings hurt. It's ok, guy. I was just stating that it's dumb for people to want to claim all these championships that we didn't even play for. Sorry, didn't know you were that sensitive to being called a smartass while you were trying to be a condescending smartass in your original post directed towards me.

    I can assure you that you have not hurt my feelings. Actually, I encourage you to call me the most vile and reprehensible names that you can possibly muster. But what's funny is that every point you've made has been countered and corrected other than what you just simply state as an opinion and you therefore default to name calling because you can't possibly argue against the facts. It's fine if it is your opinion that no one should claim an MNC beyond what has been awarded by some commercial enterprise that concentrates their business efforts on profit. But that is just your opinion. My opinion differs. And that is fine too. But when you tell me that my opinion is absurd based on incorrect facts, I may get a little condescending. But my condescension is only a result of your flawed logic. If you have a problem with that, correct yourself and try again. My response in returning the favor of name calling was nothing more than to point out by obvious double negative methods that you offered no valid counter argument and had to resort to name calling because you can't effectively force your opinion on to others who dissent by forming their own well-educated opinion. Had you not been condescending in your OP towards me in reply to my OP that didn't have anything to do with you, I'm quite certain that neither of us would have started down this path.

    signature image signature image

    No war is over until the enemy says it's over. We may think it's over, we may say it's over, but the enemy gets a vote. - Gen. James Mattis

    BigtimeAub

  • BigtimeAub said...

    I can assure you that you have not hurt my feelings. Actually, I encourage you to call me the most vile and reprehensible names that you can possibly muster. But what's funny is that every point you've made has been countered and corrected other than what you just simply state as an opinion and you therefore default to name calling because you can't possibly argue against the facts. It's fine if it is your opinion that no one should claim an MNC beyond what has been awarded by some commercial enterprise that concentrates their business efforts on profit. But that is just your opinion. My opinion differs. And that is fine too. But when you tell me that my opinion is absurd based on incorrect facts, I may get a little condescending. But my condescension is only a result of your flawed logic. If you have a problem with that, correct yourself and try again. My response in returning the favor of name calling was nothing more than to point out by obvious double negative methods that you offered no valid counter argument and had to resort to name calling because you can't effectively force your opinion on to others who dissent by forming their own well-educated opinion. Had you not been condescending in your OP towards me in reply to my OP that didn't have anything to do with you, I'm quite certain that neither of us would have started down this path.

    Firstly, no. I am not about to get in a name calling war. I called you a condescending smartass because that's what you were being. If it got under your skin so bad to where you have to rehash it, I apologize. Secondly, not one of my points has been countered with anything more than a subjective opinion of yours and you just assume yourself to be correct. This line of thinking in and of itself is incorrect considering there is no "correct" view one way or the other considering it is a subjective argument. Have a good day.

    By the way, can you point out my so called "incorrect facts" ...I'd love to hear them. And I mean where I was actually wrong, not where my opinion differed from yours. Go ahead. I'll wait.

    This post was edited by ColaChiver on 1/3/2013 at 1:47 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    ColaChiver

  • This post is for members of AuburnUndercover only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    okelley01

  • Wrong - we were the NC in the AP 1957

    This post was edited by johncook34 on 1/3/2013 at 3:06 PM

    A4D-2

    johncook34

  • This post is for members of AuburnUndercover only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    ColaChiver

  • This post is for members of AuburnUndercover only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    Rbl92