The Bodda Getta

I'd just relax. The premise of his article is that we shouldn't assume God is for or against us in a sporting event. And that if you really want to call on God, then you suddenly have to give up an financial ambitions.

This is a typical argument by a "Christian" in name only. You know, the ones who go to church twice a year, never say Grace, never give to charity, never serve their community in any capacity...

He doesn't like Chizik and the team being so outspoken about God because it makes him uncomfortable about his own relationship with God.

I'd bet this cat was not a big fan of Tim Tebow either.

Didn't read the article, but my brother and I were talking here in the dessert, before the game, about how this game seemed like God vs devil! You have conservative, bible belt Auburn vs extremely liberal, Oregon! You have one coaching staff, Admin, players, thanking God, Jesus, at every turn, one staff, haven't seen anything on that at all this whole week out of anyone from Oregon! Not saying some, all, most, aren't Christians! Just alot of things point in the direction I'm talking! Glad I am on the TRUE Winning side, and I am not talking football!

The piece was done mostly in jest. You can tell by the light, non-serious tone, especially towards the end.

I believe his point was to say:

We shouldn't attribute winning a game to His predestination. Rather, we should give thanks to Him for blessing us in spirit, strength of character, and strength in ability. These things help us win.

To say God was for us and not the ducks is a fallacy and goes against His nature.

In my post I said they all could be Christians, didn't judge a soul! Won't get into the liberal talk, don't care!

I am sorry. Comments like, "seemed like God vs. devil!", and "You have conservative, bible belt Auburn vs extremely liberal, Oregon!" shows you have already cast your judgement.

"Not saying some, all, most, aren't Christians!" just says to me that you felt the way you did despite knowing anything about them. You passed judgement without taking the time to know them.

And you just judged me whether you knew it or not demolish! Get a life!

I picked up a USA Today this morning, glanced at the sub headlines, and just put it back w/o buying it. Too much anti-Cam, anti-Auburn stuff.

We used to only see this garbage in the Inquirer; now it is everywhere--all over the internet, cable TV, you name it.

The funny thing is, if you just use common logic, you would not be saying this stuff about AU going on probation and giving back the trophy. Auburn did not even want Cam!!!!!!!!! They kind of picked up by accident. Even Cam acknowledged that on Leno last night.

Seems like if we were going to commit all of these horrible crimes, we would've least had a high motivation to do so?

The Auburn and Cam story of 2010 is one of the greatest stories ever in college football. Too bad only Auburn fans are the ones to enjoy it, but, hey, Rhett said, Frankly, I just don't give a #$@ anymore!

The only effective thing we can do is NOT read these articles. These morons get paid and rated by "clicks" on what they write. The huge reaction they get from us only incourages them to do it again and again. Hard to do, I know, but we just simply have to walk away. We know Auburn and love it.

War Eagle!

It was in the Book Of Maccabees, I think!